Transactional Analysis 2: games
Second in a series on TA, offering some of the metaphors I think can be useful in conceptualising and dealing with interactions. This second video looks at games and some ideas on how to deal with them.
—
Recommended TA texts:
1) Ian Stewart & Vann Joines: 'TA Today: A New Introduction To Transactional Analysis'
2) Thomas A Harris: 'I'm OK, You're OK'
3) Eric Berne: 'Games People Play'
—
—
Recommended TA texts:
1) Ian Stewart & Vann Joines: 'TA Today: A New Introduction To Transactional Analysis'
2) Thomas A Harris: 'I'm OK, You're OK'
3) Eric Berne: 'Games People Play'
—






I have "Games People Play" but I couldn't quite categorize some games I find myself repeating. Is there another book you could recommend?
- parent situation to me. what need of yours is being (or attempting) met, the need to be understood, or approved of by the theist? I'm asking why do you need them to understand the difference?
I think they will continue to change their state, but if they don't go into an Adult state, then the solution would be to change into Negative Parent (probably controlling) as they will likely already be embarrassed by your already more mature state, and thus, you are now the one the parent and they are the child.
Or, any state could work, that looks easiest.
I recommend them to my students
I´ve seen plenty of people discuss these topics on this site, but you somehow seem like more of an authority on the matter than most people.
I would play B and try to help people with their problems (I honestly do have a sincere want to help people) but the more often these rounds of suggestions were met with hositility rather than receptiveness, the more I came to realize that most people really had to reach for answers themselves. If I suggested things, more often than helping, I'd only be opening myself to abuse. That's no help, and no fun.
By the way, you've been an intense influence on my life. I find myself referring to your work in discussions often.
Ive found that in everyday life its best to analyse the self more than others. When practiced in this kind of thing (such as working as a counsellor) and just paying attention others reactionary behaviour is often quite obvious, but not so obvious from the self. Ive known a few psychologist who could do with taking on what they tell their clients.
Over analysing the self does have its own problems though, and as you've said Theramin, a balance needs to be found.
One of the most amazing things about the human mind, and about consciousness in general, are that infinite regresses collapse into a solid mental object. For example:
I am aware. I am aware that I am aware. I am aware that I am aware that I am aware...
This leads to an infinite regress, but we are not actually confused by it. We understand the implication and can complete the circle instead of drawing an unending spiral. The collapsed form of "I am aware..." is:
I am.