Neil DeGrasse Tyson - Greatest Sermon Ever
2006 Neil deGrasse Tyson closes the three day lecture series with an excellent final "sermon" on cosmic perspective and the impact of science. Notice Dawkins in the audience.
Uploaded by: playd76
Tags for this video: Neil DeGrasse Tyson science astrophysics physics religion beyond belief dawkins atheism christianity islam creationism
Find more videos in the "Education" category
Related Videos
Comments for this video: Show || Hide
Tags for this video: Neil DeGrasse Tyson science astrophysics physics religion beyond belief dawkins atheism christianity islam creationism
Find more videos in the "Education" category
Related Videos
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
Comments for this video: Show || Hide






I think Dawkins may have mentioned that, funny also when he mentioned members of congress that admit they are atheist, one or two I think, which is statistically almost impossible, sort of showing people lie a lot about their faith to fit in.
I wonder how many normal people do that so not to dissapoint their family?
I'm gonna convert to Cosmoism.
This literally gave me goosebumps and tear up. How fucking awesome is that fact??? Absolutely incredible....
It's not just about politics, but also about the general scientific litteracy and interest in learning more about the world via science of the public in general, especially the young generation. Let's hope that the new "Cosmos" remake will be a) good, and b) reach a LOT of young people.
Living up to the level of awesomeness of the first Cosmos will be hard, but I hope the team behind the remake will succeed.
It could be just a fad, or perhaps the church is embarassed over how Christianity has dealt with people doing open inquiry in the past and wanted to make things right for once. In any case I agree, it's a good thing if they accept some parts of reality, even though they still have many delusions.
I'd say it doesn't matter much; most likely he's an atheist by most definitions or interpretations of that word. As long as he is open to new evidence/observations and not fixed by some old religious text or "divine truth", and uses reason-based inquiry methods to back up his search for knowledge, he's ok with me. But my guess is he'd label himself a plain atheist, with appreciation for the magnificence of the universe.